Skip to content
CalibratePhysics

2.3

Potential due to a Point Charge

Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance · CBSE

Theory

The derivation CBSE sets

Take a point charge QQ at the origin and a point PP at distance rr. Bring a unit positive test charge from infinity to PP along the radial line, which is legitimate because the work is path independent.

At an intermediate point P′P' at distance r′r', the electrostatic force on a unit positive charge is

F⃗=14πε0Qr′2r^′ \vec F=\dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{Q}{r'^{2}}\hat r'

Work done by the external agent for a displacement Δr′\Delta r' is ΔW=−Q4πε0r′2Δr′\Delta W=-\dfrac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r'^{2}}\Delta r'; the minus sign appears because the displacement is inward (Δr′<0\Delta r'<0) while the work is positive. Integrating from r′=∞r'=\infty to r′=rr'=r,

W=−∫∞rQ4πε0r′2 dr′=[Q4πε0r′]∞r=Q4πε0r W=-\int_{\infty}^{r}\dfrac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r'^{2}}\,dr'=\left[\dfrac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r'}\right]_{\infty}^{r}=\dfrac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r}

By definition this work is the potential at PP:

V(r)=14πε0Qr V(r)=\dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{Q}{r}

Reading the result

  • The formula holds for either sign of QQ. For Q<0Q<0 it gives V<0V<0: the external work per unit positive charge is negative, because the electrostatic force and the displacement from infinity point the same way.
  • It is consistent with the choice V∞=0V_\infty=0: as r→∞r\to\infty, V→0V\to0.
  • Any arbitrary infinitesimal displacement resolves into a radial part and a perpendicular part; the perpendicular part does no work, which is why any path gives the same answer.

Graphs

  • VV against rr: a hyperbola, V∝1/rV\propto1/r, positive branch for Q>0Q>0, falling steeply near the charge and approaching zero asymptotically.
  • EE against rr: also decreasing, but as 1/r21/r^{2}, so it falls faster and lies below the potential curve at large rr (in the natural units Q/4πε0Q/4\pi\varepsilon_0 per metre and per square metre used in NCERT Fig. 2.4).
  • VV against 1/r1/r: a straight line through the origin with slope Q4πε0\dfrac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}. CBSE has used this: if two such lines make angles 60∘60^\circ and 30∘30^\circ with the 1/r1/r axis, then Q1Q2=tan⁡60∘tan⁡30∘=31/3=3\dfrac{Q_1}{Q_2}=\dfrac{\tan60^\circ}{\tan30^\circ}=\dfrac{\sqrt3}{1/\sqrt3}=3, i.e. Q1:Q2=3:1Q_1:Q_2=3:1.

Sign of a potential difference

For +Q+Q at OO with OA=rA<OB=rBOA=r_A<OB=r_B:

VA−VB=Q4πε0(1rA−1rB)>0 V_A-V_B=\dfrac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\left(\dfrac{1}{r_A}-\dfrac{1}{r_B}\right)>0

so VA−VBV_A-V_B is positive — potential decreases as you move away from a positive charge. State the reason, not just the sign.

Diagram to describe in words

A positive charge QQ at the origin, with a straight radial line running out to PP at distance rr. Mark an intermediate point P′P' at r′r' with the outward repulsive force on the unit test charge and the small inward displacement Δr′\Delta r'. Beside it, a graph with rr on the xx-axis carrying two curves, the shallower 1/r1/r potential curve and the steeper 1/r21/r^{2} field curve, both labelled.

Worked pattern from the textbook

For Q=4×10−7 CQ=4\times10^{-7}\ \text{C} at 9 cm9\ \text{cm}: V=9×109×4×10−70.09=4×104 VV=\dfrac{9\times10^{9}\times4\times10^{-7}}{0.09}=4\times10^{4}\ \text{V}. Bringing q=2×10−9 Cq=2\times10^{-9}\ \text{C} from infinity to that point needs W=qV=8×10−5 JW=qV=8\times10^{-5}\ \text{J}, and the answer does not depend on the path.

Standard results

QuantityResult
Potential at distance rrV=14πε0QrV=\dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{Q}{r}
Field at distance rrE=14πε0Qr2E=\dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{Q}{r^{2}}
DependenceV∝1rV\propto\dfrac1r, E∝1r2E\propto\dfrac{1}{r^{2}}
Work to bring qq from infinityW=qV=14πε0QqrW=qV=\dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{Qq}{r}
Slope of VV versus 1/r1/rQ4πε0\dfrac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}
Potential at the charge itselfUndefined (infinite)

Theory Questions Asked on This Subtopic

Real board questions. Answers are at the end of the page.

  1. 1

    A point charge +Q+Q is placed at point OO as shown in the figure. Is the potential difference VA−VBV_A-V_B positive, negative or zero? (+Q+Q is at OO; points AA and BB lie further along a straight line from OO, with OA=rA<OB=rBOA=r_A < OB=r_B.)

    1 markCBSE Class 12 Physics — Very Short Answer · Delhi 2016, Foreign 2016 · Section A, 1 markAnswer 1 ↓

Answers & Solutions

Work the questions above first, then check yourself here. Each answer is set out the way it should be written in the paper.

  1. VA=14πε0QrAV_A=\dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{Q}{r_A}, VB=14πε0QrBV_B=\dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{Q}{r_B}. Since rB>rAr_B>r_A: 1rA−1rB>0⇒VA−VB=Q4πε0(1rA−1rB)>0\dfrac{1}{r_A}-\dfrac{1}{r_B}>0 \Rightarrow V_A-V_B=\dfrac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\left(\dfrac{1}{r_A}-\dfrac{1}{r_B}\right)>0. Hence (VA−VB)(V_A-V_B) is positive (potential decreases with distance from a positive charge).