Skip to content
CalibratePhysics

1.7

Electric Field

Electric Charges and Fields · CBSE

Theory

Why the field is introduced

If a charge QQ at the origin exerts a force on a charge qq at PP, and we then remove qq, what is left at PP? The field concept answers this: QQ produces an electric field everywhere in the space around it, and when qq is brought to PP, it is the field there that acts on it and produces the force. The interaction is between the charge and the field, not action at a distance.

Definition

E⃗=lim⁡q0→0F⃗q0\vec{E} = \lim_{q_0\to0}\dfrac{\vec{F}}{q_0}

The electric field at a point is the force that would be experienced by a unit positive test charge placed at that point. The limit q0→0q_0\to0 is written because the test charge would otherwise disturb the source charge QQ; making q0q_0 negligibly small makes F⃗\vec{F} negligibly small but keeps the ratio F⃗/q0\vec{F}/q_0 finite.

  • The charge producing the field is the source charge, the charge used to detect it is the test charge.
  • The force on any charge qq placed in a field is F⃗=qE⃗\vec{F} = q\vec{E}. This equation defines the SI unit of field, N C−1\text{N C}^{-1}; an alternative unit V m−1\text{V m}^{-1} appears in Chapter 2.
  • On a positive charge the force is along E⃗\vec{E}; on a negative charge it is opposite to E⃗\vec{E}, since F⃗=−∣q∣E⃗\vec{F} = -\lvert q\rvert\vec{E}. A negative charge released in a field therefore moves opposite to E⃗\vec{E}, not along it.

Field of a point charge

E⃗(r⃗)=14πε0Qr2 r^\vec{E}(\vec{r}) = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{Q}{r^2}\,\hat{r}

where r^\hat{r} is the unit vector from the charge to the field point.

  • Direction: radially outward for a positive source charge, radially inward for a negative one.
  • Magnitude depends only on rr, so it is the same at every point of a sphere centred on the charge — the field has spherical symmetry.
  • E⃗\vec{E} is independent of the test charge: since F⃗∝q0\vec{F}\propto q_0, the ratio F⃗/q0\vec{F}/q_0 does not involve q0q_0 at all. It does depend on position, and exists at every point of three-dimensional space.

Field of a system of charges — the 5-mark derivation

Consider nn charges q1,q2,…,qnq_1, q_2, \ldots, q_n with position vectors r⃗1,r⃗2,…,r⃗n\vec{r}_1, \vec{r}_2, \ldots, \vec{r}_n relative to an origin OO, and a point PP with position vector r⃗P\vec{r}_P.

By Coulomb's law, the force on a test charge q0q_0 at PP due to q1q_1 alone is

F⃗1=14πε0q1q0r1P2 r^1P\vec{F}_1 = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{q_1q_0}{r_{1P}^{2}}\,\hat{r}_{1P}

where r1Pr_{1P} is the distance from q1q_1 to PP and r^1P\hat{r}_{1P} the unit vector from q1q_1 towards PP. Dividing by q0q_0, the field at PP due to q1q_1 is

E⃗1=F⃗1q0=14πε0q1r1P2 r^1P\vec{E}_1 = \dfrac{\vec{F}_1}{q_0} = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{q_1}{r_{1P}^{2}}\,\hat{r}_{1P}

and similarly E⃗2=14πε0q2r2P2r^2P\vec{E}_2 = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{q_2}{r_{2P}^{2}}\hat{r}_{2P}, and so on. By the principle of superposition,

E⃗=E⃗1+E⃗2+⋯+E⃗n=14πε0∑i=1nqiriP2 r^iP\vec{E} = \vec{E}_1+\vec{E}_2+\cdots+\vec{E}_n = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\dfrac{q_i}{r_{iP}^{2}}\,\hat{r}_{iP}

Null point on the line joining two charges

  • Two like charges q1q_1 and q2q_2 a distance dd apart: the field vanishes between them, at distance xx from q1q_1 where q1x2=q2(d−x)2\dfrac{q_1}{x^2} = \dfrac{q_2}{(d-x)^2}. For +1 μC+1\,\mu\text{C} and +4 μC+4\,\mu\text{C} placed 30 cm30\,\text{cm} apart, 1x2=4(30−x)2\dfrac{1}{x^2} = \dfrac{4}{(30-x)^2} gives 30−x=2x30-x = 2x, so x=10 cmx = 10\,\text{cm} from the 1 μC1\,\mu\text{C} charge.
  • Two unlike charges: the null point lies outside the pair, on the side of the smaller magnitude. For +8q+8q at x=0x=0 and −2q-2q at x=Lx=L, take the point at distance rr beyond −2q-2q: 8q(L+r)2=2qr2\dfrac{8q}{(L+r)^2} = \dfrac{2q}{r^2} gives 2r=L+r2r = L+r, so r=Lr = L and the null point is at x=2Lx = 2L.
  • Always take the square root of both sides only after checking which region can support a balance.

Field on the axis of a uniformly charged ring — a set 5-mark derivation

A thin ring of radius rr carries uniform linear charge density λ\lambda. Find EE at a point PP on the axis, at distance xx from the centre.

Take an element of length dldl on the ring, carrying charge dq=λ dldq = \lambda\,dl. Its distance from PP is r2+x2\sqrt{r^2+x^2}, so the field it produces at PP has magnitude

dE=14πε0dq(r2+x2)dE = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{dq}{(r^2+x^2)}

Resolve dEdE into a component dExdE_x along the axis and one perpendicular to it. For every element there is a diametrically opposite element whose perpendicular component is equal and opposite, so by symmetry all perpendicular components cancel round the ring and only the axial components survive:

dEx=dEcos⁡θ=14πε0λ dl(r2+x2)⋅x(r2+x2)1/2=λ x dl4πε0(r2+x2)3/2dE_x = dE\cos\theta = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{\lambda\,dl}{(r^2+x^2)}\cdot\dfrac{x}{(r^2+x^2)^{1/2}} = \dfrac{\lambda\,x\,dl}{4\pi\varepsilon_0(r^2+x^2)^{3/2}}

Integrating round the whole circumference l=2πrl = 2\pi r,

E=∫dEcos⁡θ=14πε0λ x l(r2+x2)3/2=14πε0qx(r2+x2)3/2E = \int dE\cos\theta = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{\lambda\,x\,l}{(r^2+x^2)^{3/2}} = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{qx}{(r^2+x^2)^{3/2}}

with q=λl=λ(2πr)q = \lambda l = \lambda(2\pi r) the total charge on the ring, directed along the axis away from the ring for q>0q>0.

For x≫rx\gg r, (r2+x2)3/2≈x3(r^2+x^2)^{3/2}\approx x^3, so

E=14πε0qxx3=14πε0qx2E = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{qx}{x^3} = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{q}{x^2}

which is exactly the field of a point charge qq at distance xx — at large distances the ring behaves as a point charge. At the centre, x=0x = 0 gives E=0E = 0.

Motion of a charge in a uniform field

Since F⃗=qE⃗\vec{F} = q\vec{E} is constant, the acceleration a⃗=qE⃗m\vec{a} = \dfrac{q\vec{E}}{m} is constant and the ordinary kinematic equations apply.

Worked pattern: a particle of charge 2 μC2\,\mu\text{C} and mass 1.6 g1.6\,\text{g} moving with u⃗=4i^ m s−1\vec{u} = 4\hat{i}\,\text{m s}^{-1} enters a field E⃗=80i^+60j^ N C−1\vec{E} = 80\hat{i}+60\hat{j}\ \text{N C}^{-1} at t=0t=0. From qE⃗=ma⃗q\vec{E} = m\vec{a},

a⃗=2×10−6(80i^+60j^)1.6×10−3=0.1i^+0.075j^ m s−2\vec{a} = \dfrac{2\times10^{-6}(80\hat{i}+60\hat{j})}{1.6\times10^{-3}} = 0.1\hat{i}+0.075\hat{j}\ \text{m s}^{-2}

and v⃗=u⃗+a⃗t\vec{v} = \vec{u}+\vec{a}t at t=5 st = 5\,\text{s} gives v⃗=4.5i^+0.375j^ m s−1\vec{v} = 4.5\hat{i}+0.375\hat{j}\ \text{m s}^{-1}.

Charged bob in a horizontal field

A small object of charge qq and weight mgmg hangs from a string of length LL in a uniform horizontal field EE, the string settling at angle θ\theta to the vertical. Resolving the tension: Tcos⁡θ=mgT\cos\theta = mg vertically and Tsin⁡θ=qET\sin\theta = qE horizontally. Dividing,

qE=mgtan⁡θ ⇒ q=(mgE)tan⁡θqE = mg\tan\theta\ \Rightarrow\ q = \left(\dfrac{mg}{E}\right)\tan\theta

If the bob is deflected in the direction of E⃗\vec{E}, the charge is positive.

Standard results

  • EE of a point charge falls as 1/r21/r^2; the field of a short dipole falls as 1/r31/r^3.
  • Field due to a charge qq at the surface of a sphere it is spread over is q4πε0R2\dfrac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0R^2}.
  • A uniformly charged shell behaves outside itself as a point charge at its centre. Combining that with the point-charge law: if a point charge 2q2q gives EE at distance rr, a shell of total charge qq gives kq(r/2)2=4kqr2=2E\dfrac{kq}{(r/2)^2} = \dfrac{4kq}{r^2} = 2E at distance r/2r/2, for r≫Rr\gg R.

Theory Questions Asked on This Subtopic

Real board questions. Answers are at the end of the page.

  1. 1

    Assertion (A): A negative charge in an electric field moves along the direction of the electric field. Reason (R): On a negative charge, a force acts in the direction of the electric field.

    • (a)

      Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of the Assertion (A).

    • (b)

      Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of the Assertion (A).

    • (c)

      Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false.

    • (d)

      Assertion (A) is false and Reason (R) is also false.

    1 markCBSE Class 12 Physics — Assertion · Term I 2021-22, U · Section A, 1 markAnswer 1 ↓
  2. 2

    A particle of charge 2 μC2\,\mu\text{C} and mass 1.6 g1.6\,\text{g} is moving with a velocity 4i^ m s−14\hat{i}\,\text{m s}^{-1}. At t=0t=0 the particle enters in a region having an electric field E⃗\vec{E} (in N C−1\text{N C}^{-1}) =80i^+60j^=80\hat{i}+60\hat{j}. Find the velocity of the particle at t=5 st = 5\,\text{s}.

    3 marksCBSE Class 12 Physics — SA · 2/3, 2020 · Section C, 3 marksAnswer 2 ↓
  3. 3

    Two point charges of +1 μC+1\,\mu\text{C} and +4 μC+4\,\mu\text{C} are kept 30 cm30\,\text{cm} apart. How far from the +1 μC+1\,\mu\text{C} charge, on the line joining the two charges, will the net electric field be zero?

    5 marksCBSE Class 12 Physics — Long Answer · 2/5, 2020 · Section E, 5 marksAnswer 3 ↓
  4. 4

    A thin circular ring of radius rr is charged uniformly so that its linear charge density becomes λ\lambda. Derive an expression for the electric field at a point PP at a distance xx from it along the axis of the ring. Hence, prove that at large distances (x≫r)(x \gg r), the ring behaves as a point charge.

    5 marksCBSE Class 12 Physics — Long Answer · 3/5, 2020, Ev · Section E, 5 marksAnswer 4 ↓
  5. 5

    Consider a system of nn charges q1,q2,…,qnq_1, q_2, \ldots, q_n with position vectors r⃗1,r⃗2,r⃗3,…,r⃗n\vec{r}_1, \vec{r}_2, \vec{r}_3, \ldots, \vec{r}_n relative to some origin OO. Deduce the expression for the net electric field E⃗\vec{E} at a point PP with position vector r⃗P\vec{r}_P due to this system of charges.

    5 marksCBSE Class 12 Physics — Long Answer · 3/5, Foreign 2015 · Section E, 5 marksAnswer 5 ↓

Answers & Solutions

Work the questions above first, then check yourself here. Each answer is set out the way it should be written in the paper.

  1. The force on a negative charge in an electric field is F⃗=−qE⃗\vec{F} = -q\vec{E}, so it acts opposite to the direction of the electric field (the charge moves opposite to E⃗\vec{E}, not along it). Hence both (A) and (R) are false.

  2. From Newton's second law, qE⃗=ma⃗q\vec{E} = m\vec{a} 2×10−6(80i^+60j^)=(1.6×10−3)a⃗2\times10^{-6}(80\hat{i}+60\hat{j}) = (1.6\times10^{-3})\vec{a} a⃗=100×10−3i^+75×10−3j^ m s−2\vec{a} = 100\times10^{-3}\hat{i}+75\times10^{-3}\hat{j}\,\text{m s}^{-2} Using v⃗=u⃗+a⃗t\vec{v} = \vec{u}+\vec{a}t with u⃗=4i^ m s−1\vec{u} = 4\hat{i}\,\text{m s}^{-1}, t=5 st=5\,\text{s}: v⃗=4i^+(100×10−3i^+75×10−3j^)×5\vec{v} = 4\hat{i}+(100\times10^{-3}\hat{i}+75\times10^{-3}\hat{j})\times5 v⃗=4.5i^+0.375j^ m s−1\vec{v} = 4.5\hat{i}+0.375\hat{j}\,\text{m s}^{-1}

  3. Let the net field be zero at a point PP, distance xx from q1=1 μCq_1=1\,\mu\text{C} (so distance (30−x)(30-x) from q2=4 μCq_2=4\,\mu\text{C}). 14πε0q1x2=14πε0q2(30−x)2\dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{q_1}{x^2} = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{q_2}{(30-x)^2} 1x2=4(30−x)2 ⇒ x=10 cm\dfrac{1}{x^2} = \dfrac{4}{(30-x)^2} \ \Rightarrow\ x = 10\,\text{cm} So the electric field is zero at 10 cm10\,\text{cm} from the +1 μC+1\,\mu\text{C} charge.

  4. Consider an elementary charge dq=λ dldq = \lambda\,dl on the ring, where dldl is an elementary length. The distance from this element to the axial point PP is r2+x2\sqrt{r^2+x^2}. The field due to dqdq at PP is dE=dq4πε0(r2+x2)dE = \dfrac{dq}{4\pi\varepsilon_0(r^2+x^2)}, resolved into dExdE_x (along the axis) and dEydE_y (perpendicular to it). By symmetry, the perpendicular components cancel around the ring and only the axial components add: dEx=dEcos⁡θ=λ x dl4πε0(r2+x2)3/2dE_x = dE\cos\theta = \dfrac{\lambda\,x\,dl}{4\pi\varepsilon_0(r^2+x^2)^{3/2}} ∴ Ex=∫dEcos⁡θ=∫λ x dl4πε0(r2+x2)3/2=14πε0xλl(r2+x2)3/2\therefore\ E_x = \displaystyle\int dE\cos\theta = \int\dfrac{\lambda\,x\,dl}{4\pi\varepsilon_0(r^2+x^2)^{3/2}} = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{x\lambda l}{(r^2+x^2)^{3/2}} where l=2πrl = 2\pi r is the circumference (total charge q=λlq=\lambda l), so E=14πε0xq(r2+x2)3/2E = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{xq}{(r^2+x^2)^{3/2}} When x≫rx \gg r: (r2+x2)3/2≈x3(r^2+x^2)^{3/2} \approx x^3, so E=14πε0xqx3=14πε0qx2E = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{xq}{x^3} = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{q}{x^2} which is exactly the field of a point charge qq at distance xx — hence at large distances, the ring behaves as a point charge.

  5. According to Coulomb's law, the force on a test charge q0q_0 placed at PP due to charge q1q_1 is F⃗1=14πε0q1q0r1P2r^1P\vec{F}_1 = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{q_1q_0}{r_{1P}^2}\hat{r}_{1P} where r^1P\hat{r}_{1P} is the unit vector from q1q_1 to PP and r1Pr_{1P} is the distance between them. The electric field at PP due to q1q_1 is E⃗1=F⃗1q0=14πε0q1r1P2r^1P\vec{E}_1 = \dfrac{\vec{F}_1}{q_0} = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{q_1}{r_{1P}^2}\hat{r}_{1P} Similarly, the field due to q2q_2 is E⃗2=14πε0q2r2P2r^2P\vec{E}_2 = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{q_2}{r_{2P}^2}\hat{r}_{2P}, and so on. By the principle of superposition, the net field at PP is E⃗=E⃗1+E⃗2+…+E⃗n=14πε0∑i=1nqiriP2r^iP\vec{E} = \vec{E}_1+\vec{E}_2+\ldots+\vec{E}_n = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{n}\dfrac{q_i}{r_{iP}^2}\hat{r}_{iP}